From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1756131AbdDMJNF (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 13 Apr 2017 05:13:05 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:57589 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750745AbdDMJM7 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 13 Apr 2017 05:12:59 -0400
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:12:48 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
        dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
        tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
        edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
        bobby.prani@gmail.com, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/13] mm: Rename SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU to
 SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU
Message-ID: <20170413091248.xnctlppstkrm6eq5@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20170412165441.GA17149@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <1492016149-18834-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1492016149-18834-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 09:55:37AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> A group of Linux kernel hackers reported chasing a bug that resulted
> from their assumption that SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU provided an existence
> guarantee, that is, that no block from such a slab would be reallocated
> during an RCU read-side critical section.  Of course, that is not the
> case.  Instead, SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU only prevents freeing of an entire
> slab of blocks.

And that while we wrote a huge honking comment right along with it...

> [ paulmck: Add "tombstone" comments as requested by Eric Dumazet. ]

I cannot find any occurrence of "tomb" or "TOMB" in the actual patch,
confused?