linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: alex.williamson@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: eric.auger@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, peterx@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, slp@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] vfio/type1: Prune vfio_pin_page_external()
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 19:42:39 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170417014239.25866.42333.stgit@gimli.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170417014142.25866.16852.stgit@gimli.home>

With vfio_lock_acct() testing the locked memory limit under mmap_sem,
it's redundant to do it here for a single page.  We can also reorder
our tests such that we can avoid testing for reserved pages if we're
not doing accounting, and test the process CAP_IPC_LOCK only if we
are doing accounting.  Finally, this function oddly returns 1 on
success.  Update to return zero on success, -errno on error.  Since
the function only pins a single page, there's no need to return the
number of pages pinned.

N.B. vfio_pin_pages_remote() can pin a large contiguous range of pages
before calling vfio_lock_acct().  If we were to similarly remove the
extra test there, a user could temporarily pin far more pages than
they're allowed.

Suggested-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c |   34 +++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index fb18e4a5df62..07e0e58f22e9 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -479,43 +479,21 @@ static long vfio_unpin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, dma_addr_t iova,
 static int vfio_pin_page_external(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
 				  unsigned long *pfn_base, bool do_accounting)
 {
-	unsigned long limit;
-	bool lock_cap = has_capability(dma->task, CAP_IPC_LOCK);
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
 	int ret;
-	bool rsvd;
 
 	mm = get_task_mm(dma->task);
 	if (!mm)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	ret = vaddr_get_pfn(mm, vaddr, dma->prot, pfn_base);
-	if (ret)
-		goto pin_page_exit;
-
-	rsvd = is_invalid_reserved_pfn(*pfn_base);
-	limit = task_rlimit(dma->task, RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-
-	if (!rsvd && !lock_cap && mm->locked_vm + 1 > limit) {
-		put_pfn(*pfn_base, dma->prot);
-		pr_warn("%s: Task %s (%d) RLIMIT_MEMLOCK (%ld) exceeded\n",
-			__func__, dma->task->comm, task_pid_nr(dma->task),
-			limit << PAGE_SHIFT);
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto pin_page_exit;
-	}
-
-	if (!rsvd && do_accounting) {
-		ret = vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, 1, lock_cap);
-		if (ret) {
+	if (!ret && do_accounting && !is_invalid_reserved_pfn(*pfn_base)) {
+		ret = vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, 1,
+				     has_capability(dma->task, CAP_IPC_LOCK));
+		if (ret)
 			put_pfn(*pfn_base, dma->prot);
-			goto pin_page_exit;
-		}
 	}
 
-	ret = 1;
-
-pin_page_exit:
 	mmput(mm);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -595,10 +573,8 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages(void *iommu_data,
 		remote_vaddr = dma->vaddr + iova - dma->iova;
 		ret = vfio_pin_page_external(dma, remote_vaddr, &phys_pfn[i],
 					     do_accounting);
-		if (ret <= 0) {
-			WARN_ON(!ret);
+		if (ret)
 			goto pin_unwind;
-		}
 
 		ret = vfio_add_to_pfn_list(dma, iova, phys_pfn[i]);
 		if (ret) {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-17  1:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-17  1:42 [PATCH v4 0/2] vfio/type1: Synchronous locked page accounting Alex Williamson
2017-04-17  1:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] vfio/type1: Remove locked page accounting workqueue Alex Williamson
2017-04-17  6:47   ` Peter Xu
2017-04-17 14:32     ` Alex Williamson
2017-04-17 19:05       ` Kirti Wankhede
2017-04-17 19:19         ` Alex Williamson
2017-04-17 19:32           ` Kirti Wankhede
2017-04-17 21:32             ` Alex Williamson
2017-04-18  2:54               ` Peter Xu
2017-04-18 18:21                 ` Kirti Wankhede
2017-04-17  1:42 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2017-04-17  6:54   ` [PATCH v4 2/2] vfio/type1: Prune vfio_pin_page_external() Peter Xu
2017-04-17 17:20     ` Alex Williamson
2017-04-17 19:16   ` Kirti Wankhede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170417014239.25866.42333.stgit@gimli.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=slp@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).