From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent transition delays
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:11:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170417054150.GH28191@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71055380.gdY33coAtF@aspire.rjw.lan>
On 11-04-17, 00:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Make the schedutil governor take the initial (default) value of the
> rate_limit_us sysfs attribute from the (new) transition_delay_us
> policy parameter (to be set by the scaling driver).
>
> That will allow scaling drivers to make schedutil use smaller default
> values of rate_limit_us and reduce the default average time interval
> between consecutive frequency changes.
>
> Make intel_pstate set transition_delay_us to 500.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>
> This is a replacement for https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9671831/
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-17 5:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-10 0:07 [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Updates related to the rate limit Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-10 0:10 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent latency multupliers Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-10 10:38 ` Brendan Jackman
2017-04-10 11:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-10 22:20 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent transition delays Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-11 11:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-11 14:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-14 22:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-15 2:23 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-04-18 9:43 ` Brendan Jackman
2017-04-17 5:41 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2017-04-10 0:11 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Utilization aggregation Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-10 6:39 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-04-10 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-11 1:57 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-04-11 20:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-10 11:26 ` Juri Lelli
2017-04-10 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-11 7:00 ` Juri Lelli
2017-04-11 21:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170417054150.GH28191@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=brendan.jackman@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).