From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937805AbdDSPxG (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:53:06 -0400 Received: from gum.cmpxchg.org ([85.214.110.215]:46180 "EHLO gum.cmpxchg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S937715AbdDSPxE (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:53:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:52:52 -0400 From: Johannes Weiner To: "Huang, Ying" Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrea Arcangeli , Ebru Akagunduz , Michal Hocko , Tejun Heo , Hugh Dickins , Shaohua Li , Minchan Kim , Rik van Riel , cgroups@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -v9 1/3] mm, THP, swap: Delay splitting THP during swap out Message-ID: <20170419155252.GA3376@cmpxchg.org> References: <20170419070625.19776-1-ying.huang@intel.com> <20170419070625.19776-2-ying.huang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170419070625.19776-2-ying.huang@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 03:06:23PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > @@ -206,17 +212,34 @@ int add_to_swap(struct page *page, struct list_head *list) > */ > err = add_to_swap_cache(page, entry, > __GFP_HIGH|__GFP_NOMEMALLOC|__GFP_NOWARN); > - > - if (!err) { > - return 1; > - } else { /* -ENOMEM radix-tree allocation failure */ > + /* -ENOMEM radix-tree allocation failure */ > + if (err) > /* > * add_to_swap_cache() doesn't return -EEXIST, so we can safely > * clear SWAP_HAS_CACHE flag. > */ > - swapcache_free(entry); > - return 0; > + goto fail_free; > + > + if (unlikely(PageTransHuge(page))) { > + err = split_huge_page_to_list(page, list); > + if (err) { > + delete_from_swap_cache(page); > + return 0; > + } > } > + > + return 1; > + > +fail_free: > + if (unlikely(PageTransHuge(page))) > + swapcache_free_cluster(entry); > + else > + swapcache_free(entry); > +fail: > + if (unlikely(PageTransHuge(page)) && > + !split_huge_page_to_list(page, list)) > + goto retry; May I ask why you added the unlikelies there? Can you generally say THPs are unlikely in this path? Is the swap-out path so hot that branch layout is critical? I doubt either is true. Also please mention changes like these in the changelog next time.