On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:27:52PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > There are Device Tree source files defining a device node for the > retu/tahvo I2C chip, but there isn't a DT binding document for it. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > Acked-by: Rob Herring > Acked-by: Aaro Koskinen > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren > Acked-by: Lee Jones > --- > > Changes in v5: > - Add missing properties for interrupts to DT binding doc (Rob Herring). > - Add Rob Herring's Acked-by tag. > - Add Aaro Koskinen's Acked-by tag. > - Add Acked-by: Tony Lindgren 's Acked-by tag. > - Add Lee Jones 's Acked-by tag. > > Changes in v4: > - Use "dt-bindings: mfd:" prefix in subject line (Rob Herring). > - Add information about what functions the device serve (Lee Jones). > - Avoid using MFD in Device Tree (Lee Jones). > > Changes in v3: None > Changes in v2: None > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/retu.txt | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/retu.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/retu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/retu.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..e1ea3a36a038 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/retu.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ > +* Device tree bindings for Nokia Retu and Tahvo multi-function device > + > +Retu and Tahvo are a multi-function devices found on Nokia Internet > +Tablets (770, N800 and N810). The Retu chip provides watchdog timer > +and power button control functionalities while Tahvo chip provides > +USB transceiver functionality. > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: "nokia,retu" or "nokia,tahvo" > +- reg: Specifies the I2C slave address of the ASIC chip This should be "CBUS slave address". CBUS is a strange subset of I2C, yet I'd like the distinction because 0x1 is not a valid I2C address. > +- interrupts: The interrupt line the device is connected to > +- interrupt-parent: The parent interrupt controller > + > +Example: > + > +i2c0 { To make it super clear, we are talking CBUS here, it might make sense to add here: + compatible = "i2c-cbus-gpio"; + ... ? It could be argued that the above "i2c0" should be "cbus0" as well but that is a separate issue, I'd think. > + retu: retu@1 { > + compatible = "nokia,retu"; > + interrupt-parent = <&gpio4>; > + interrupts = <12 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; > + reg = <0x1>; > + }; > +};