linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 19/33] ftrace: Remove printing of data in showing of a function probe
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 17:30:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170421213330.916952994@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20170421213020.875637678@goodmis.org

[-- Attachment #1: 0019-ftrace-Remove-printing-of-data-in-showing-of-a-funct.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 973 bytes --]

From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

None of the probe users uses the data field anymore of the entry. They all
have their own print() function. Remove showing the data field in the
generic function as the data field will be going away.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 1c31c74d0819..15f910a03822 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -3154,11 +3154,7 @@ t_hash_show(struct seq_file *m, struct ftrace_iterator *iter)
 	if (rec->ops->print)
 		return rec->ops->print(m, rec->ip, rec->ops, rec->data);
 
-	seq_printf(m, "%ps:%ps", (void *)rec->ip, (void *)rec->ops->func);
-
-	if (rec->data)
-		seq_printf(m, ":%p", rec->data);
-	seq_putc(m, '\n');
+	seq_printf(m, "%ps:%ps\n", (void *)rec->ip, (void *)rec->ops->func);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.10.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-21 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-21 21:30 [for-next][PATCH 00/33] tracing: More updates for 4.12 Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 01/33] ftrace: Fix removing of second function probe Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 02/33] ftrace: Fix indexing of t_hash_start() from t_next() Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 03/33] tracing: Have the trace_event benchmark thread call cond_resched_rcu_qs() Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 04/33] ftrace: Add function-fork trace option Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 05/33] selftests: ftrace: Add -l/--logdir option Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 06/33] selftests: ftrace: Add a way to reset triggers in the set_ftrace_filter file Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 07/33] selftests: ftrace: Add a selftest to test event enable/disable func trigger Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 08/33] selftests: ftrace: Add a test to test function triggers to start and stop tracing Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 09/33] selftests: ftrace: Add test to test reading of set_ftrace_file Steven Rostedt
2017-05-22  3:23   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-05-26 15:02     ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 10/33] ftrace: Move the probe function into the tracing directory Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 11/33] ftrace: Move the function commands " Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 12/33] ftrace: Remove unused "flags" field from struct ftrace_func_probe Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 13/33] ftrace: Pass probe ops to probe function Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 14/33] ftrace: Added ftrace_func_mapper for function probe triggers Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 15/33] tracing: Have the snapshot trigger use the mapping helper functions Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 16/33] ftrace: Convert the rest of the function trigger over to the mapping functions Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 17/33] ftrace: Remove unused unregister_ftrace_function_probe() function Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 18/33] ftrace: Remove unused unregister_ftrace_function_probe_all() function Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 20/33] ftrace: Remove data field from ftrace_func_probe structure Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 21/33] ftrace: Add helper function ftrace_hash_move_and_update_ops() Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 22/33] ftrace: Have unregister_ftrace_function_probe_func() return a value Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 23/33] ftrace: Have each function probe use its own ftrace_ops Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 24/33] ftrace: Have the function probes call their own function Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 25/33] ftrace: If the hash for a probe fails to update then free what was initialized Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 26/33] tracing: Have the trace_array hold the list of registered func probes Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 27/33] tracing: Pass the trace_array into ftrace_probe_ops functions Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 28/33] ftrace: Dynamically create the probe ftrace_ops for the trace_array Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 29/33] tracing/ftrace: Add a better way to pass data via the probe functions Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 30/33] tracing/ftrace: Allow instances to have their own function probes Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 31/33] tracing/ftrace: Enable snapshot function trigger to work with instances Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 32/33] tracing/ftrace: Allow for the traceonoff probe be unique to instances Steven Rostedt
2017-04-21 21:30 ` [for-next][PATCH 33/33] tracing/ftrace: Allow for instances to trigger their own stacktrace probes Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170421213330.916952994@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).