From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1040114AbdDUNsR (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:48:17 -0400
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:49710 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1040117AbdDUNsO (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:48:14 -0400
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:48:04 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] powerpc: kprobes: emulate instructions on kprobe
 handler re-entry
Message-Id: <20170421224804.4213332fafa6d9fe18868fa1@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <87lgqv4ni9.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
References: <cover.1492604782.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
        <0d4193a90e4b2ad3cd2ef33d41228b80a2ac9f91.1492604782.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
        <20170419234319.7893df9c158e565fede4a386@kernel.org>
        <1492620027.h27iuc5j5o.astroid@naverao1-tp.none>
        <87lgqv4ni9.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:11:10 +1000
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:

> "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> 
> > Excerpts from Masami Hiramatsu's message of April 19, 2017 20:13:
> >> 
> >> BTW, as I pointed, 5/7 and 6/7 should be merged since this actually
> >> makes meaningful change.
> >
> > Yes, sorry if I wasn't clear in my previous reply in the (!) previous 
> > patch series.
> >
> > Since this has to go through the powerpc tree, I followed this since I 
> > felt that Michael Ellerman prefers to keep functional changes separate 
> > from refactoring. I'm fine with either approach.
> >
> > Michael?
> 
> Yeah I'd definitely like this to be two patches. Otherwise when reading
> the combined diff it's much harder to see the change.

OK, let it be so.

Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Thanks,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>