From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jslaby@suse.cz
Cc: alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
jpoimboe@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/29] x86: bpf_jit, use ENTRY+ENDPROC
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:08:44 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170424.110844.1321374394090353753.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7a94f4e-6d93-a447-a62f-3f290e66c647@suse.cz>
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:52:43 +0200
> On 04/24/2017, 04:41 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>> It cannot stay as-is simply because we want to know where the functions
>>> end to inject debuginfo properly. The code above does not warrant for
>>> any exception.
>>
>> I totally and completely disagree.
>
> You can disagree as you wish but there is really nothing special on the
> bpf code with respect to annotations.
>
>>> Executing a nop takes a little and having externally-callable functions
>>> aligned can actually help performance (no, I haven't measured nor tested
>>> the code). But sure, the tool is generic, so I can introduce a local
>>> macros to avoid alignments in the functions:
>>
>> Not for this case, it's a bunch of entry points all packed together
>> intentionally so that SKB accesses of different access sizes (which is
>> almost always the case) from BPF programs use the smallest amount of
>> I-cache as possible.
>
> And for that reason I suggested the special macros for the code (see the
> macros in the e-mail you replied to again). So what problem do you
> actually have with the suggested solution?
If you align the entry points, then the code sequence as a whole is
are no longer densely packed.
Or do I misunderstand how your macros work?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-24 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-21 14:12 [PATCH v3 01/29] x86: boot/copy, remove unused functions Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 02/29] x86_32: boot, extract efi_pe_entry from startup_32 Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 03/29] x86_64: boot, extract efi_pe_entry from startup_64 Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 04/29] x86: assembly, use ENDPROC for functions Jiri Slaby
2017-04-26 1:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-05-12 7:53 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-05-12 22:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-05-17 13:23 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-05-19 9:17 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-05-19 19:50 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 05/29] x86: assembly, add ENDPROC to functions Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 06/29] x86: assembly, annotate functions by ENTRY, not GLOBAL Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 07/29] x86: bpf_jit, use ENTRY+ENDPROC Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 19:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-04-24 6:45 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-04-24 14:41 ` David Miller
2017-04-24 14:52 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-04-24 15:08 ` David Miller [this message]
2017-04-24 15:41 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-04-24 15:51 ` David Miller
2017-04-24 15:53 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-04-24 15:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-04-24 16:02 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-04-24 16:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-04-24 16:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-04-24 17:51 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-04-24 18:24 ` David Miller
2017-04-25 14:41 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 08/29] linkage: new macros for assembler symbols Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 09/29] x86: assembly, use DATA_SIMPLE for data Jiri Slaby
2017-04-27 11:53 ` Pavel Machek
2017-04-27 12:30 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-04-27 12:43 ` Pavel Machek
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 10/29] x86: assembly, annotate relocate_kernel Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 11/29] x86: entry, annotate THUNKs Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 12/29] x86: assembly, annotate local functions Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 13/29] x86: crypto, " Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 14/29] x86: boot, " Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 15/29] x86: assembly, annotate aliases Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 16/29] x86: entry, annotate interrupt symbols properly Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 17/29] x86: head, annotate data appropriatelly Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 18/29] x86: boot, " Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 19/29] x86: um, " Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 20/29] x86: xen-pvh, " Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 21/29] x86: purgatory, start using annotations Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 22/29] x86: assembly, use SYM_FUNC_INNER_LABEL instead of GLOBAL Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 23/29] x86: realmode, use SYM_DATA_* " Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:13 ` [PATCH v3 24/29] x86: assembly, remove GLOBAL macro Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:13 ` [PATCH v3 25/29] x86: assembly, make some functions local Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:13 ` [PATCH v3 26/29] x86_64: assembly, change all ENTRY to SYM_FUNC_START Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:13 ` [PATCH v3 27/29] x86_32: " Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:13 ` [PATCH v3 28/29] x86_32: lguest, use SYM_ENTRY Jiri Slaby
2017-04-21 14:13 ` [PATCH v3 29/29] x86: assembly, replace WEAK uses Jiri Slaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170424.110844.1321374394090353753.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).