From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1164723AbdDXEiR (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:38:17 -0400
Received: from LGEAMRELO13.lge.com ([156.147.23.53]:39954 "EHLO
        lgeamrelo13.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1164670AbdDXEiN (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:38:13 -0400
X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.151
X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com
X-Original-SENDERIP: 165.244.249.23
X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com
X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.222.33
X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 13:36:56 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CC: <mingo@kernel.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <walken@google.com>,
        <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, <kirill@shutemov.name>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        <willy@infradead.org>, <npiggin@gmail.com>, <kernel-team@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/15] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature
Message-ID: <20170424043656.GI21430@X58A-UD3R>
References: <1489479542-27030-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
 <1489479542-27030-6-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
 <20170419150835.f2nky5qda5ooqfhy@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170419150835.f2nky5qda5ooqfhy@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on LGEKRMHUB01/LGE/LG Group(Release 8.5.3FP6|November
 21, 2013) at 2017/04/24 13:38:04,
        Serialize by Router on LGEKRMHUB01/LGE/LG Group(Release 8.5.3FP6|November
 21, 2013) at 2017/04/24 13:38:04,
        Serialize complete at 2017/04/24 13:38:04
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 05:08:35PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:18:52PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Only access local task's data, so irq disable is only required.
> > + */
> > +static int same_context_xhlock(struct hist_lock *xhlock)
> > +{
> > +	struct task_struct *curr = current;
> > +
> > +	/* In the case of hardirq context */
> > +	if (curr->hardirq_context) {
> > +		if (xhlock->hlock.irq_context & 2) /* 2: bitmask for hardirq */
> > +			return 1;
> > +	/* In the case of softriq context */
> > +	} else if (curr->softirq_context) {
> > +		if (xhlock->hlock.irq_context & 1) /* 1: bitmask for softirq */
> > +			return 1;
> > +	/* In the case of process context */
> > +	} else {
> > +		if (xhlock->work_id == curr->work_id)
> > +			return 1;
> > +	}
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> 
> static bool same_context_xhlock(struct hist_lock *xhlock)
> {
> 	return xhlock->hlock.irq_context == task_irq_context(current) &&
> 	       xhlock->work_id == current->work_id;
> }

D'oh, thank you.