From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1430072AbdDYMAL (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:00:11 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:39696 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1947144AbdDYMAD (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:00:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 13:59:48 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Denys Vlasenko Cc: Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , Brian Gerst , Peter Zijlstra , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, msr: Better document AMD "tweak MSRs", rename MSR_F15H_IC_CFG Message-ID: <20170425115948.6hekn2xklodjil7e@pd.tnic> References: <20170425114541.8267-1-dvlasenk@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170425114541.8267-1-dvlasenk@redhat.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 01:45:41PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > Before this patch, we have a define for MSR 0xc0011021: MSR_F15H_IC_CFG. > But it exists starting from K8, so it's not really a Fam15h MSR only. > > Lat's call it MSR_AMD64_IC_CFG. Except that we name only those MSRs with "AMD64" which are architectural. See "Appendix A MSR Cross-Reference" in APM vol 2. And the ones you want to rename are not and there is no guarantee about anything wrt to those. So no, I'd prefer if those remained per-family as it is now. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.