From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1034308AbdD0NmJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:42:09 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35440 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1033030AbdD0NmA (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:42:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:41:58 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Igor Stoppa Cc: namhyung@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove hardcoding of ___GFP_xxx bitmasks Message-ID: <20170427134158.GI4706@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20170426133549.22603-1-igor.stoppa@huawei.com> <20170426133549.22603-2-igor.stoppa@huawei.com> <20170426144750.GH12504@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 26-04-17 18:29:08, Igor Stoppa wrote: [...] > If you prefer to have this patch only as part of the larger patchset, > I'm also fine with it. I agree that the situation is not ideal. If a larger set of changes would benefit from this change then it would clearly add arguments... > Also, if you could reply to [1], that would be greatly appreciated. I will try to get to it but from a quick glance, yet-another-zone will hit a lot of opposition... -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs