From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1164525AbdD1FWX (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2017 01:22:23 -0400 Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:45615 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752546AbdD1FWP (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2017 01:22:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 07:22:09 +0200 From: Simon Horman To: Chris Brandt Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Jacopo Mondi , Linus Walleij , Geert Uytterhoeven , Laurent Pinchart , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Linux-Renesas , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/10] arm: dts: genmai: Add ethernet pin group Message-ID: <20170428052208.GF18349@verge.net.au> References: <1493281194-5200-1-git-send-email-jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org> <1493281194-5200-11-git-send-email-jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organisation: Horms Solutions BV User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:48:45AM +0000, Chris Brandt wrote: > Hi Geert, > > On Thursday, April 27, 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > +ðer { > > > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > > > + pinctrl-0 = <ðer_pins>; > > > + > > > + status = "okay"; > > > + > > > + renesas,no-ether-link; > > > + phy-handle = <&phy0>; > > > + phy0: ethernet-phy@0 { > > > + reg = <0>; > > > > Shouldn't the interrupt (connected to P1_15) be described? > > > That interrupt pin from the PHY is not used. It did not need to be connected. So things are fine as above or should I expect to see v6?