From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1424844AbdD1IbX (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2017 04:31:23 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:55552 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1424785AbdD1IbM (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2017 04:31:12 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, John Dias , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Alexander Shishkin , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Kees Cook , Linus Torvalds , Min Chong , Stephane Eranian , Thomas Gleixner , Vince Weaver , Ingo Molnar , Ben Hutchings Subject: [PATCH 4.4 17/17] perf/core: Fix concurrent sys_perf_event_open() vs. move_group race Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:30:30 +0200 Message-Id: <20170428082912.947570971@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.12.2 In-Reply-To: <20170428082910.160564394@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20170428082910.160564394@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Peter Zijlstra commit 321027c1fe77f892f4ea07846aeae08cefbbb290 upstream. Di Shen reported a race between two concurrent sys_perf_event_open() calls where both try and move the same pre-existing software group into a hardware context. The problem is exactly that described in commit: f63a8daa5812 ("perf: Fix event->ctx locking") ... where, while we wait for a ctx->mutex acquisition, the event->ctx relation can have changed under us. That very same commit failed to recognise sys_perf_event_context() as an external access vector to the events and thereby didn't apply the established locking rules correctly. So while one sys_perf_event_open() call is stuck waiting on mutex_lock_double(), the other (which owns said locks) moves the group about. So by the time the former sys_perf_event_open() acquires the locks, the context we've acquired is stale (and possibly dead). Apply the established locking rules as per perf_event_ctx_lock_nested() to the mutex_lock_double() for the 'move_group' case. This obviously means we need to validate state after we acquire the locks. Reported-by: Di Shen (Keen Lab) Tested-by: John Dias Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Min Chong Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Fixes: f63a8daa5812 ("perf: Fix event->ctx locking") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170106131444.GZ3174@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar [bwh: Backported to 4.4: - Test perf_event::group_flags instead of group_caps - Adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/events/core.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -8250,6 +8250,37 @@ static int perf_event_set_clock(struct p return 0; } +/* + * Variation on perf_event_ctx_lock_nested(), except we take two context + * mutexes. + */ +static struct perf_event_context * +__perf_event_ctx_lock_double(struct perf_event *group_leader, + struct perf_event_context *ctx) +{ + struct perf_event_context *gctx; + +again: + rcu_read_lock(); + gctx = READ_ONCE(group_leader->ctx); + if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&gctx->refcount)) { + rcu_read_unlock(); + goto again; + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + + mutex_lock_double(&gctx->mutex, &ctx->mutex); + + if (group_leader->ctx != gctx) { + mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex); + mutex_unlock(&gctx->mutex); + put_ctx(gctx); + goto again; + } + + return gctx; +} + /** * sys_perf_event_open - open a performance event, associate it to a task/cpu * @@ -8486,8 +8517,26 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open, } if (move_group) { - gctx = group_leader->ctx; - mutex_lock_double(&gctx->mutex, &ctx->mutex); + gctx = __perf_event_ctx_lock_double(group_leader, ctx); + + /* + * Check if we raced against another sys_perf_event_open() call + * moving the software group underneath us. + */ + if (!(group_leader->group_flags & PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE)) { + /* + * If someone moved the group out from under us, check + * if this new event wound up on the same ctx, if so + * its the regular !move_group case, otherwise fail. + */ + if (gctx != ctx) { + err = -EINVAL; + goto err_locked; + } else { + perf_event_ctx_unlock(group_leader, gctx); + move_group = 0; + } + } } else { mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex); } @@ -8582,7 +8631,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open, perf_unpin_context(ctx); if (move_group) - mutex_unlock(&gctx->mutex); + perf_event_ctx_unlock(group_leader, gctx); mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex); if (task) { @@ -8610,7 +8659,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open, err_locked: if (move_group) - mutex_unlock(&gctx->mutex); + perf_event_ctx_unlock(group_leader, gctx); mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex); /* err_file: */ fput(event_file);