From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S969166AbdD3QKy (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:10:54 -0400
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:55258 "EHLO
        ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S938907AbdD3QKp (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:10:45 -0400
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 17:10:40 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: new ...at() flag: AT_NO_JUMPS
Message-ID: <20170430161040.GW29622@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20170429220414.GT29622@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <CALCETrXhOhG0tRDDOROwT9ghvQvKziM2PBN=CX5Soa2m7=0cFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170429232504.GU29622@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <20170430043822.GE27790@bombadil.infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170430043822.GE27790@bombadil.infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 09:38:22PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> It sounds more like AT_NO_ESCAPE ... or AT_BELOW, or something.

I considered AT_ROACH_MOTEL at one point...  Another interesting
question is whether EXDEV would've been better than ELOOP.
Opinions?