From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1948934AbdEAOpw (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2017 10:45:52 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:46758 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1947101AbdEAOpu (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2017 10:45:50 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 16:45:41 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Corentin Labbe , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Maxime Ripard , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Giuseppe Cavallaro , alexandre.torgue@st.com, devicetree , linux-kernel , linux-arm-kernel , netdev Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/20] net-next: stmmac: add dwmac-sun8i ethernet driver Message-ID: <20170501144541.GB1285@lunn.ch> References: <20170501124520.3769-1-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> <20170501140133.GD31281@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 10:28:46PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 02:45:00PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote: > >> Hello > >> > >> This patch series add the driver for dwmac-sun8i which handle the Ethernet MAC > >> present on Allwinner H3/H5/A83T/A64 SoCs. > >> > >> This driver is the continuation of the sun8i-emac driver. > >> During the development, it appeared that in fact the hardware was a modified > >> version of some dwmac. > >> So the driver is now written as a glue driver for stmmac. > >> > >> It supports 10/100/1000 Mbit/s speed with half/full duplex. > >> It can use an internal PHY (MII 10/100) or an external PHY > >> via RGMII/RMII. > > > > Hi Corentin > > > > Sorry if this has been asked before.... > > > > Does the internal PHY have a phy driver? It seems like > > tx-delay-ps/rx-delay-ps are properties of this internal PHY, and so > > should be in the phy driver, if it has one. > > Nope. These affect the delay lines for the external PHY interface. Oh, yes. I understood the patch wrong. None of the patches actually use these properties. Are they actually needed? We should avoid adding vendor specific properties, if they are not used. Andrew