From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751483AbdEBL7x (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 2 May 2017 07:59:53 -0400
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:53800 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1750952AbdEBL7u (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 2 May 2017 07:59:50 -0400
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 13:59:44 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86_64: inline copy_page() at call site
Message-ID: <20170502115944.GC6485@nazgul.tnic>
References: <20170426182318.GA5069@avx2>
 <20170426182806.GB5069@avx2>
 <20170428210409.ap3bnb4i3l4gm36p@pd.tnic>
 <CACVxJT9u6Xj3ZLOf0mNUBTiF-AeTGR9k4hGgkH9zA0Bh9LDbBQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACVxJT9u6Xj3ZLOf0mNUBTiF-AeTGR9k4hGgkH9zA0Bh9LDbBQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 02:49:04PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> It says unambiguously which instruction does the actual copying.

And that doesn't tell me that it is an unrolled moving using registers.
And that is much more useful info when I look at stack traces than just
"mov".

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--