linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
	kaber@trash.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-ipv4] question about arguments position
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 14:24:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170504142432.Horde.g9y26Ryxbtg1EIl_cnsdbbw@gator4166.hostgator.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1493925433.31950.0.camel@perches.com>


Quoting Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>:

[]
>> > > +/*
>> > > + * Ignore the position of the arguments req->id.idiag_dport and
>> > > + * req->id.idiag_sport in both calls to inet_lookup() and  
>> inet6_lookup()
>> > > + * functions, once this is a locked in behavior exposed to user space.
>> > > + * Changing this will break things for people.
>> > > + */
>> > >   struct sock *inet_diag_find_one_icsk(struct net *net,
>> > >                                       struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo,
>> > >                                       const struct  
>> inet_diag_req_v2 *req)
>> > >
>> >
>> > Seems sensible.  Thanks.
>>
>> Should I resend it in a full and proper format or it can taken from here?
>
> If you want it applied, it should be resent as a full patch
> with your sign-off.

I'll send it shortly.

Thanks for clarifying
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-04 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-04 16:07 [net-ipv4] question about arguments position Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-05-04 16:46 ` David Miller
2017-05-04 16:56   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-05-04 17:47   ` Joe Perches
2017-05-04 19:00     ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-05-04 19:02       ` Joe Perches
2017-05-04 19:15         ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-05-04 19:17           ` Joe Perches
2017-05-04 19:24             ` Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
2017-05-04 19:44               ` [PATCH] net: ipv4: add code comment for clarification Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-05-08 15:36                 ` David Miller
2017-05-08 15:44                   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170504142432.Horde.g9y26Ryxbtg1EIl_cnsdbbw@gator4166.hostgator.com \
    --to=garsilva@embeddedor.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).