From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752336AbdEDU2m (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 4 May 2017 16:28:42 -0400
Received: from mail-yb0-f181.google.com ([209.85.213.181]:34263 "EHLO
        mail-yb0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752045AbdEDU2k (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 4 May 2017 16:28:40 -0400
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 16:28:38 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
        Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [RFC PATCHSET v2] sched/fair: fix load balancer behavior when cgroup
 is in use
Message-ID: <20170504202838.GA2647@htj.duckdns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello,

v1 posting can be found at

  http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170424201344.GA14169@wtj.duckdns.org

The patchset is still RFC and based on v4.11.  I used Peter's updated
calc_cfs_shares() instead of scaling manually and updated so that
runnable_load_avg is propagated independently from load_avg.  Due to
the way sched_entity and cfs_rq loads are calculated, this requires an
extra runnable_load_avg calculation for group sched_entities, but the
end result is cleaner and actually makes sense.

Vincent, can you please verify whether the regression that you see is
gone with this version?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun