From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752986AbdEHHG5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2017 03:06:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:35461 "EHLO mail-pf0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751948AbdEHHGz (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2017 03:06:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 12:36:46 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Sean Wang Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, robh+dt@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, shunli.wang@mediatek.com, erin.lo@mediatek.com, jdelvare@suse.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] dt-bindings: cpufreq: enhance Mediatek cpufreq dt-binding document Message-ID: <20170508070646.GE17010@vireshk-i7> References: <1493997974-17699-1-git-send-email-sean.wang@mediatek.com> <1493997974-17699-7-git-send-email-sean.wang@mediatek.com> <20170508042010.GD17010@vireshk-i7> <1494226711.9662.22.camel@mtkswgap22> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1494226711.9662.22.camel@mtkswgap22> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08-05-17, 14:58, Sean Wang wrote: > > > + opp@598000000 { > > > > s/opp@/opp-/ > > I have referred to other dt-binding as examples where they also use opp@ > as the prefix word. e.g bindings/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.txt did it. > > Or I misunderstand something you pointed out here ? Its on the way: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=149266711829469&w=2 -- viresh