linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] perf/tracing/cpuhotplug: Fix locking order
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 11:13:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170512181357.GW3956@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170512171544.100715273@goodmis.org>

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 01:15:44PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> NOTE: This was quickly written. The change logs and patches probably need
> some loving. This is for discussion. These may become legitimate patches,
> but for now, I'm seeing if this is an acceptable solution.
> 
> Also note, I checked out the last branch that I had Linus pull, and then
> merged with tip's commit b53e5129~1, which is the commit just before
> "trace/perf: Cure hotplug lock ordering issues" in tip/smp/hotplug
> that placed get_online_cpus() ahead of event_mutex. The issue is that
> event_mutex is a high level mutex, and trying to make sure that
> get_online_cpus() is held whenever it is held and is going to be a
> nightmare. So I started ahead of that commit, but I needed changes
> in my own repo to do full testing. I renamed this temp branch to
> "tip/cpuhotplug", and you can pull it as well. But this is not going
> to be a candidate for pushing to Linus.
> 
> The 5 patches here are:
> 
>  1) fix a lockdep splat when taking stack trace in irqsoff tracing
>     (one of my tests triggered this)
> 
>  2) Allow for get_online_cpus() to nest
> 
>  3) Have kprobes take get_online_cpus() before taking jump label lock.
> 
>  4) Have tracepoints always take get_online_cpus
> 
>  5) Have perf take event_mutex before taking get_online_cpus()
> 
> Thoughts?

First a thought on the use of get_online_cpus()...

Your mileage may vary, but from what I have seen, life is very good
if your piece of the kernel uses get_online_cpus(), but refrains from
using the CPU-hotplug notifiers.  Life is also very good if your piece
of the kernel uses CPU-hotplug notifiers, but refrains from using
get_online_cpus().  If your code uses both get_online_cpus() -and-
CPU-hotplug notifiers for the same data structures, life can be quite
complex and difficult.

For RCU, I cannot avoid using notifiers, so I have been removing uses
of get_online_cpus().  Removing each of these has made large numbers of
race conditions with CPU hotplug simply disappear -- not much reduction
in lines of code, but big reductions in complexity and in state space.
I have one more to go in _rcu_barrier().

Again, your mileage may vary.

							Thanx, Paul

> -- Steve
> 
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace.git
> tip/cpuhotplug
> 
> Head SHA1: ddb06e08fa10ed5030285267a9b1e25d40c337c8
> 
> 
> Steven Rostedt (VMware) (5):
>       tracing: Make sure RCU is watching before calling a stack trace
>       cpu-hotplug: Allow get_online_cpus() to nest
>       kprobes: Take get_online_cpus() before taking jump_label_lock()
>       tracepoints: Grab get_online_cpus() before taking tracepoints_mutex
>       perf: Grab event_mutex before taking get_online_cpus()
> 
> ----
>  include/linux/sched.h           | 1 +
>  include/linux/trace_events.h    | 2 ++
>  kernel/cpu.c                    | 9 +++++++++
>  kernel/events/core.c            | 9 +++++++++
>  kernel/fork.c                   | 1 +
>  kernel/kprobes.c                | 6 +++---
>  kernel/trace/trace.c            | 5 +++++
>  kernel/trace/trace.h            | 1 -
>  kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c | 8 ++++----
>  kernel/tracepoint.c             | 5 +++++
>  10 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-12 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-12 17:15 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] perf/tracing/cpuhotplug: Fix locking order Steven Rostedt
2017-05-12 17:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] tracing: Make sure RCU is watching before calling a stack trace Steven Rostedt
2017-05-12 18:25   ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-12 18:36     ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-12 18:50       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-12 20:05         ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-12 20:31           ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-17 16:46             ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-12 17:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] cpu-hotplug: Allow get_online_cpus() to nest Steven Rostedt
2017-05-12 18:35   ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-12 18:40     ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-12 18:52       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-12 22:15   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-05-13  0:23     ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-12 17:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] kprobes: Take get_online_cpus() before taking jump_label_lock() Steven Rostedt
2017-05-12 18:39   ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-12 18:44     ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-17 17:50   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-05-12 17:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] tracepoints: Grab get_online_cpus() before taking tracepoints_mutex Steven Rostedt
2017-05-12 17:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] perf: Grab event_mutex before taking get_online_cpus() Steven Rostedt
2017-05-12 18:13 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-05-12 19:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] perf/tracing/cpuhotplug: Fix locking order Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 20:14   ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-12 21:34   ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-13 13:40     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-15  9:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-15 18:40         ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-16  8:19           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-16 12:46             ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-16 14:27               ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-17 10:40                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-17 14:55                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-18  3:58                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-15 19:06   ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170512181357.GW3956@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).