From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1760142AbdEWK1Z (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 23 May 2017 06:27:25 -0400
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:36764 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1759966AbdEWK1Y (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 23 May 2017 06:27:24 -0400
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 12:27:12 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ben Pineau <benjamin.pineau@mirakl.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Two sched patchs missing from 4.4-stable: inclusion possible?
Message-ID: <20170523102712.GF28565@kroah.com>
References: <CACaSxvbptarOqNTD058eoxbxb770NiK70PaoYRvwW1MkBRX-2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170518093500.GA20808@kroah.com>
 <20170518105103.locuxtyazicdnf4y@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170518105103.locuxtyazicdnf4y@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:51:03PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:35:00AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:11:23AM +0200, Ben Pineau wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > The following two patches series, merged in mainline 4.7, was Cc'ed to stable@,
> > > but somehow didn't made its way to the 4.4.x stable tree:
> > >   754bd598be9bbc953bc709a9e8ed7f3188bfb9d7
> > >   094f469172e00d6ab0a3130b0e01c83b3cf3a98d
> 
> It would be so much easier if that were normal quotes like:
> 
> 754bd598be9b ("sched/fair: Do not announce throttled next buddy in dequeue_task_fair()")
> 094f469172e0 ("sched/fair: Initialize throttle_count for new task-groups lazily")
> 
> Then I'd not have had to look them up. And I'm most certainly not going
> to click through various interweb sites to provide answers.
> 
> > Sure, I'll be glad to take them if I can get an ack from the patch
> > authors, and reviewers (added to: and cc:)...
> > 
> > Ingo and Peter, any objections?
> 
> No, those patches should be fine I think.

Thanks, now queued up.

greg k-h