From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936703AbdEYRbt (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2017 13:31:49 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:47060 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753595AbdEYRbp (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2017 13:31:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 19:31:31 +0200 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Pavel Machek Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Alan Cox , "Theodore Ts'o" , Linus Torvalds , AKASHI Takahiro , Greg KH , Rusty Russell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ciaran Farrell , Christopher De Nicolo , Richard Fontana , Discussion and development of copyleft-next , One Thousand Gnomes , Paul Bolle , Peter Anvin , Joe Perches Subject: Re: [copyleft-next] Re: Kernel modules under new copyleft licence : (was Re: [PATCH v2] module.h: add copyleft-next >= 0.3.1 as GPL compatible) Message-ID: <20170525173131.GX8951@wotan.suse.de> References: <20170516232702.GL17314@wotan.suse.de> <20170517165502.b6jqdcmkgz6iyau2@thunk.org> <20170517174128.GQ17314@wotan.suse.de> <20170518221205.gcfs2t4ihlpx5kj6@thunk.org> <20170518230442.GC8951@wotan.suse.de> <1495193510.7848.101.camel@linux.intel.com> <20170519150920.GF8951@wotan.suse.de> <20170519175912.GL8951@wotan.suse.de> <20170525170518.GC3085@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170525170518.GC3085@amd> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 07:05:18PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > >> Alright, this makes sense. > > >> > > >> As noted though there are a few "or" clauses, which upstream file > > >> is a good template to use for copyleft-next ? > > > > > > There seems to be a few "or" clauses. For instance: > > > > > > a) you can pick either license [0] > > > b) gpl on Linux, otherwise this other license below [1] > > > > > > To help uplift copyleft will go with b). > > > > > > [0] drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/driver.c > > > [1] drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c > > > > So that yields: > > > > * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it > > * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free > > * Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or at your option) any > > * later version; or, when distributed separately from the Linux kernel or > > * incorporated into other software packages, subject to the > > You have more )s there than (s. Thanks just removed that pesky ) > Can you get rid of the "when distributed separately from the Linux > kernel or incorporated into other software packages," wording? I'm not > exactly sure what it is trying to say, and if it limits the license > below in any way. I had to pick an "or language" used already upstream and which folks were OK with, this was one and I went with it. I prefer it as it makes it clear the intent is outside of Linux I wish copyleft-next to apply. Luis