From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751309AbdEaRzH (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 May 2017 13:55:07 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f65.google.com ([209.85.218.65]:35592 "EHLO mail-oi0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751067AbdEaRyl (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 May 2017 13:54:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 12:54:39 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: sean.wang@mediatek.com Cc: matthias.bgg@gmail.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, john@phrozen.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: update for MT7623n SoC and relevant boards Message-ID: <20170531175439.bclgr4atbxrmgpna@rob-hp-laptop> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:02:39PM +0800, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Sean Wang > > Because there are two versions of MT7623 SoC that is MT7623a and MT7623n > respectively. So update the part of MT7623n bindings to allow that people > tend to differentiate which MT7623 SoC the boards applies. > > And "mediatek,mt7623-evb" can be safely changed to > "mediatek,mt7623n-rfb-nand" because mt7623-evb is a kind of debug board > internally in Mediatek which real users can't get. So instead we should > indicate which variants it belongs to with more specific postfix as the > adding here to let people easily know what board they use. > > Signed-off-by: John Crispin > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek.txt | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Acked-by: Rob Herring