From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751149AbdFANV2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:21:28 -0400 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([62.4.15.54]:38700 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751078AbdFANV1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:21:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:21:15 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Pavel Machek Cc: Darwin Dingel , "richard@nod.at" , "dwmw2@infradead.org" , "computersforpeace@gmail.com" , "marek.vasut@gmail.com" , "cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mark.marshall@omicronenergy.com" , "b44839@freescale.com" , "prabhakar@freescale.com" Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] mtd: nand: fsl_ifc: fix handing of bit flips in erased pages Message-ID: <20170601152115.06895287@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20170601131232.GA12630@amd> References: <20170420002748.5c76c9b9@bbrezillon> <20170420114057.GA4705@amd> <20170421105107.GA7259@amd> <20170517122224.GB583@amd> <20170517143211.205ff5de@bbrezillon> <20170517130059.GA3437@amd> <20170517152548.6d52c41b@bbrezillon> <20170517200305.GA12537@amd> <20170531205917.GA21878@amd> <3ff6a5a52b4744caaa481d482cab54bd@svr-chch-ex1.atlnz.lc> <20170601131232.GA12630@amd> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:12:32 +0200 Pavel Machek wrote: > On Thu 2017-06-01 01:09:17, Darwin Dingel wrote: > > Hi Pavel, > > > > Just a minor thing. Sorry about the late comment. > > > > On 01/06/17 08:59, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > + > > > + res = check_erased_page(chip, buf); > > > + return res; > > > + } > > > > Can we just remove 'res' and change this line to: > > return check_erased_page(chip, buf); > > Well... I originally had a printk there, and yes, it can be > simplified. I can roll v3, if required, but I'd leave it as is -- it > is still convenient place to add debugging to. I can fix it when applying, no need to send a new version. Regards, Boris