From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751237AbdFBOWL (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:22:11 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:43150 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750971AbdFBOWJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:22:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 10:22:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20170602.102205.701672574727845689.davem@davemloft.net> To: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com Cc: clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, wens@csie.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, peppe.cavallaro@st.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/21] net-next: stmmac: add dwmac-sun8i ethernet driver From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20170602091320.lyfxsanxrypfpozb@flea.lan> References: <20170601.145819.789604139072328057.davem@davemloft.net> <20170602063752.aqyvwcykvepiyt4y@flea.lan> <20170602091320.lyfxsanxrypfpozb@flea.lan> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Fri, 02 Jun 2017 06:40:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Maxime Ripard Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:13:20 +0200 > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 08:37:52AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:58:19PM -0400, David Miller wrote: >> > From: Corentin Labbe >> > Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 09:18:31 +0200 >> > >> > > This patch series add the driver for dwmac-sun8i which handle the Ethernet MAC >> > > present on Allwinner H3/H5/A83T/A64 SoCs. >> > >> > Series applied, but wow that's a lot of DT file changes :-( >> >> The DT patches should not go through your tree, but arm-soc, so I >> guess this is not an issue for you? > > Ok, so I saw that you actually merged them. Can you revert or drop > that merge for the DT part? > > This will generate a lot of conflicts with our tree, and I'm not sure > this would be efficient to make you take all the entirely unrelated to > next patches. Please tell me which specific changes to revert. Thank you.