From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751351AbdFEPas (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:30:48 -0400
Received: from mail-pg0-f45.google.com ([74.125.83.45]:33529 "EHLO
        mail-pg0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751162AbdFEPaq (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:30:46 -0400
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 08:30:38 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
        Jork Loeser <Jork.Loeser@microsoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
        "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of
 virtual/logical processor
Message-ID: <20170605083038.753a27e5@xeon-e3>
In-Reply-To: <20170605112427.7994a3af@gandalf.local.home>
References: <20170524120405.19079-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
        <20170524120405.19079-3-vkuznets@redhat.com>
        <CAHp75VeLBwwUKJbugA1Ti_Df76R7G3=qyyx2mufYZaWtmcUZ+A@mail.gmail.com>
        <20170605112427.7994a3af@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:24:27 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 27 May 2017 20:43:58 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:  
> > > Max virtual processor will be needed for 'extended' hypercalls supporting
> > > more than 64 vCPUs. While on it, unify on 'Hyper-V' in mshyperv.c as we
> > > currently have a mix, report acquired misc features as well.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> > > Acked-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
> > > Tested-by: Simon Xiao <sixiao@microsoft.com>
> > > Tested-by: Srikanth Myakam <v-srm@microsoft.com>    
> >   
> > > +       u32 max_vp_index;
> > > +       u32 max_lp_index;    
> >   
> > > +       pr_info("Hyper-V: max %d virtual processors, %d logical processors\n",
> > > +               ms_hyperv.max_vp_index, ms_hyperv.max_lp_index);    
> > 
> > And surprisingly no-one from the above list did not get a warning?!  

Gcc 6.3 does not warn when %d is used on unsigned values.


> Begs to question how many other warnings are they ignoring?
None.