From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751558AbdFGMP6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2017 08:15:58 -0400 Received: from nblzone-211-213.nblnetworks.fi ([83.145.211.213]:46206 "EHLO hillosipuli.retiisi.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751428AbdFGMPp (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2017 08:15:45 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 15:15:04 +0300 From: Sakari Ailus To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Rajmohan Mani , Hans de Goede , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , Lee Jones , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] ACPI / PMIC: Add TI PMIC TPS68470 operation region driver Message-ID: <20170607121503.GA1019@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> References: <1496750118-5570-1-git-send-email-rajmohan.mani@intel.com> <1496750118-5570-4-git-send-email-rajmohan.mani@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:23:56PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Follow the pattern, please, I suppose > ti_pmic_tps68470.c This pattern is weird. "ti" in front of the file name is redundant, and in very few places the vendor prefix is used anyway. Especially when the chip has a proper name --- as this one does. I assume for the Intel PMICs it could be there for a couple of reasons which are 1) lack of a clearly unique chip ID and 2) the use of common frameworklet for Intel PMICs. There are also no other PMIC chips supported currently. The pmic_tps68470 naming is in line with the GPIO driver (apart from the dash / underscore difference). -- Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi XMPP: sailus@retiisi.org.uk