From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752126AbdFHOCr (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:02:47 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:56260 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751449AbdFHOCo (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:02:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 10:02:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20170608.100222.1573468093040905016.davem@davemloft.net> To: arnd@arndb.de Cc: babu.moger@oracle.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, geert@linux-m68k.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: CPU_BIG_ENDIAN in generic code From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <877f0z6oig.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <28d6c874-4653-b15d-39b7-57a032abc9c6@oracle.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Thu, 08 Jun 2017 06:20:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:01:59 +0200 > I would also suggest adding a sanity check like Hmm, but this will kill the build for non-fixed endian architectures won't it?