[PATCH v6] mtd: handle partitioning on devices with 0 erasesize

* [PATCH v6] mtd: handle partitioning on devices with 0 erasesize
@ 2017-06-09  3:58 Chris Packham
  2017-06-09 23:17 ` Brian Norris
  2017-06-10  6:00 ` Boris Brezillon
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Packham @ 2017-06-09  3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: computersforpeace, boris.brezillon, linux-mtd
  Cc: linux-kernel, andrew, Chris Packham, David Woodhouse,
	Marek Vasut, Richard Weinberger, Cyrille Pitchen

erasesize is meaningful for flash devices but for SRAM there is no
concept of an erase block so erasesize is set to 0. When partitioning
these devices instead of ensuring partitions fall on erasesize
boundaries we ensure they fall on writesize boundaries.

Helped-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
---
Changes in v3:
- new
Changes in v4:
- None
Changes in v5:
- None (yet). There is some active discussion on this so it may change.
  patch 4/5 is somewhat dependent on this but only if partitions are
  specified on the dt node.
  Changes in v6:
- Use MTD_NO_ERASE flag to decide whether to use writesize or erasesize
  for alignment purposes

 drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
index ea5e5307f667..2e152e53ace0 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
@@ -393,8 +393,12 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partition(struct mtd_info *master,
 			const struct mtd_partition *part, int partno,
 			uint64_t cur_offset)
 {
+	int wr_alignment = (master->flags & MTD_NO_ERASE) ? master->writesize:
+							    master->erasesize;
 	struct mtd_part *slave;
+	u32 remainder;
 	char *name;
+	u64 tmp;
 
 	/* allocate the partition structure */
 	slave = kzalloc(sizeof(*slave), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -499,10 +503,11 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partition(struct mtd_info *master,
 	if (slave->offset == MTDPART_OFS_APPEND)
 		slave->offset = cur_offset;
 	if (slave->offset == MTDPART_OFS_NXTBLK) {
+		tmp = cur_offset;
 		slave->offset = cur_offset;
-		if (mtd_mod_by_eb(cur_offset, master) != 0) {
-			/* Round up to next erasesize */
-			slave->offset = (mtd_div_by_eb(cur_offset, master) + 1) * master->erasesize;
+		remainder = do_div(tmp, wr_alignment);
+		if (remainder) {
+			slave->offset += wr_alignment - remainder;
 			printk(KERN_NOTICE "Moving partition %d: "
 			       "0x%012llx -> 0x%012llx\n", partno,
 			       (unsigned long long)cur_offset, (unsigned long long)slave->offset);
@@ -567,19 +572,22 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partition(struct mtd_info *master,
 		slave->mtd.erasesize = master->erasesize;
 	}
 
-	if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) &&
-	    mtd_mod_by_eb(slave->offset, &slave->mtd)) {
+	tmp = slave->offset;
+	remainder = do_div(tmp, wr_alignment);
+	if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) && remainder) {
 		/* Doesn't start on a boundary of major erase size */
 		/* FIXME: Let it be writable if it is on a boundary of
 		 * _minor_ erase size though */
 		slave->mtd.flags &= ~MTD_WRITEABLE;
-		printk(KERN_WARNING"mtd: partition \"%s\" doesn't start on an erase block boundary -- force read-only\n",
+		printk(KERN_WARNING"mtd: partition \"%s\" doesn't start on an erase/write block boundary -- force read-only\n",
 			part->name);
 	}
-	if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) &&
-	    mtd_mod_by_eb(slave->mtd.size, &slave->mtd)) {
+
+	tmp = slave->mtd.size;
+	remainder = do_div(tmp, wr_alignment);
+	if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) && remainder) {
 		slave->mtd.flags &= ~MTD_WRITEABLE;
-		printk(KERN_WARNING"mtd: partition \"%s\" doesn't end on an erase block -- force read-only\n",
+		printk(KERN_WARNING"mtd: partition \"%s\" doesn't end on an erase/write block -- force read-only\n",
 			part->name);
 	}
 
-- 
2.13.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread