From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752096AbdFOHvx (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 03:51:53 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50036 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751141AbdFOHvu (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 03:51:50 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6FED6214EC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=shawnguo@kernel.org Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 15:51:01 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Jagan Teki Cc: Jagan Teki , linux-arm-kernel , devicetree , linux-kernel , Sascha Hauer , Fabio Estevam , Matteo Lisi , Michael Trimarchi Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] ARM: dts: imx6ul-isiot: Add Sound card with codec node Message-ID: <20170615075059.GD5902@dragon> References: <1491501735-1649-1-git-send-email-jagan@openedev.com> <1491501735-1649-2-git-send-email-jagan@openedev.com> <20170407131649.GH16503@dragon> <20170615022024.GE30112@dragon> <20170615071529.GC5902@dragon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 01:01:22PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > I feel the abstraction is wrong from the beginning. Ideally, we should > > have something like below. > > > > - imx6ul-isiot.dtsi > > - imx6ul-isiot-kit.dts and imx6ul-isiot-carrier.dts > > > > The -isiot should have everything on SoM and common stuff between -kit > > and -carrier boards, while -kit and -carrier include -isiot and contains > > the base-board specific things. The -isiot can have both emmc and nand > > devices with "disabled" status, and let firmware turn device on per SoM > > it boots. In that case, the abstraction level can be less and clearer. > > > > Thoughts? > > So,even the common stuff (lcdif, ts and etc) should be in -isiot.dtsi Yes, anything common can be in -isiot.dtsi. > and make it "disabled" and let them enabled on respective dts. this > what you mentioned here? It doesn't matter. If the lcd/touch is same on -kit and -carrier, you can even have them enabled by default in -isiot.dtsi. The -kit.dts and -carrier.dts are there to accommodate base-board specific differences. Shawn