From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753503AbdFPL6S (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 16 Jun 2017 07:58:18 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55468 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1753364AbdFPL6Q (ORCPT <rfc822;Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 16 Jun 2017 07:58:16 -0400
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 3C7F530AF52
Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 3C7F530AF52
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:57:44 +0200
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Yao Jin <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: perf report: fix off-by-one for non-activation frames
Message-ID: <20170616115744.GA14948@host1.jankratochvil.net>
References: <20170515150444.6841-1-milian.wolff@kdab.com>
 <20170616061456.GA2472@host1.jankratochvil.net>
 <5576772.scvU8aRrkq@agathebauer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5576772.scvU8aRrkq@agathebauer>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:58:05 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:51:37 +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > perf-4.12.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc27.x86_64
> >                   39e32e gdb_main (/usr/libexec/gdb)
> >                   10b6fa main (/usr/libexec/gdb)
> >    0x000055555565f6f6 <+54>:    callq  0x5555558f17a0 <gdb_main(captured_main_args*)
> >    0x000055555565f6fb <+59>:    mov    0x18(%rsp),%rcx
[...]
> Excuse me, but I'm having trouble following you. The non-GDB backtraces you 
> are pasting do not show srcline information. So what exactly is broken?

There is broken that perf now reports address 10b6fa (corresponding to
relocated address 0x000055555565f6fa) but there is no instruction on address
0x000055555565f6fa.  If you 'objdump -d' it you cannot find any instruction on
adress 0x000055555565f6fa (or on address 0x10b6fa).  There is instruction on
address 0x000055555565f6fb.


> Maybe paste the perf output you get now and highlight what you'd expect
> instead?

Actual:
                  39e32e gdb_main (/usr/libexec/gdb)
                  10b6fa main (/usr/libexec/gdb)
Expected:
                  39e32f gdb_main (/usr/libexec/gdb)
                  10b6fb main (/usr/libexec/gdb)

I agree perf needs to calculate with 39e32e and 10b6fa.  But it should display
to user 39e32f and 10b6fb.


Jan