From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752922AbdFTBZe (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2017 21:25:34 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:57406 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752677AbdFTBZc (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2017 21:25:32 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org AF28960117 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sboyd@codeaurora.org Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:25:30 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: Chunyan Zhang Cc: Michael Turquette , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mark Brown , Xiaolong Zhang , Orson Zhai , Geng Ren , Chunyan Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 0/9] add clock driver for Spreadtrum platforms Message-ID: <20170620012530.GG4493@codeaurora.org> References: <20170618015855.27738-1-chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170618015855.27738-1-chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/18, Chunyan Zhang wrote: > In the last cycle, the patches support Whale2 sc9860 mobile chip have been > merged. This patchset adds clock driver which is used on almost all > Spreadtrum SoCs. > > This is a rewrite of Spreadtrum's original clock driver[1] according to the > comments[2] from Stephen Boyd. > > This series also adds Spreadtrum clock binding documentation and devicetree > data. > > Any comments would be greatly appreciated. Overall it seems to copy quite a bit of code from sunxi-ng, which is OK, but if that's just copy/paste + replace some names then perhaps we should consolidate the two implementations into one that both SoCs can use. Also, is there any reason why we can't use a platform device driver for this instead of the DT probing mechanism? That is more preferred method of probing clk controllers. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project