From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
To: "Michał Kępień" <kernel@kempniu.pl>
Cc: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: do not use kfifo for storing hotkey scancodes
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:58:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170622235809.GB27213@fury> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170622204619.GB4194@kmp-mobile.hq.kempniu.pl>
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:46:19PM +0200, Michał Kępień wrote:
> > The events seen by userspace with the original code would be "A-press",
> > "B-press", "A-release", "B-release". With the revised code the order of the
> > release events would be reversed compared to the previous behaviour. That
> > is, unless I've misunderstood how sparse_keymap_report_event() works.
>
> All you wrote above is correct and this patch does change the order of
> release events sent to userspace when multiple hotkeys are pressed
> simultaneously. The question is: is it relevant for any practical
> scenario?
>
> Anyway, I find this matter to be of secondary importance. The primary
> objective of this patch is to get rid of the kfifo. If anyone has
> strong feelings about the change in event ordering, I will be happy to
> revert to FIFO in v2.
This all looks reasonable to me, I don't see anything requiring a respin.
--
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-22 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-16 4:40 [PATCH 0/7] fujitsu-laptop: ACPI-related cleanups Michał Kępień
2017-06-16 4:40 ` [PATCH 1/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: do not use kfifo for storing hotkey scancodes Michał Kępień
2017-06-21 18:15 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-21 23:50 ` Jonathan Woithe
2017-06-22 2:44 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-22 3:01 ` Jonathan Woithe
2017-06-22 20:46 ` Michał Kępień
2017-06-22 23:58 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2017-06-23 0:14 ` Jonathan Woithe
2017-06-23 5:54 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-22 20:08 ` Michał Kępień
2017-06-24 0:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-27 0:07 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-27 12:16 ` Jonathan Woithe
2017-06-28 4:30 ` Michał Kępień
2017-06-28 16:03 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-16 4:40 ` [PATCH 2/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: remove redundant safety checks Michał Kępień
2017-06-16 4:40 ` [PATCH 3/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: use strcpy to set ACPI device names and classes Michał Kępień
2017-06-16 4:40 ` [PATCH 4/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: sanitize hotkey input device identification Michał Kępień
2017-06-16 4:40 ` [PATCH 5/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: do not update ACPI device power status Michał Kępień
2017-06-21 20:17 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-22 21:02 ` Michał Kępień
2017-06-22 23:58 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-23 0:16 ` Jonathan Woithe
2017-06-23 5:52 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-16 4:40 ` [PATCH 6/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: do not evaluate ACPI _INI methods Michał Kępień
2017-06-16 4:40 ` [PATCH 7/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: rework debugging Michał Kępień
2017-06-18 10:35 ` [PATCH 0/7] fujitsu-laptop: ACPI-related cleanups Jonathan Woithe
2017-06-22 23:57 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170622235809.GB27213@fury \
--to=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=jwoithe@just42.net \
--cc=kernel@kempniu.pl \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).