From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754250AbdFWIyQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2017 04:54:16 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f194.google.com ([209.85.128.194]:35152 "EHLO mail-wr0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753906AbdFWIyG (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2017 04:54:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:54:02 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Andrew Morton , Mark Rutland , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrey Ryabinin , kasan-dev , "x86@kernel.org" , LKML , "linux-mm@kvack.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] x86: switch atomic.h to use atomic-instrumented.h Message-ID: <20170623085402.kfzu6sri6bwi2ppo@gmail.com> References: <20170622141411.6af8091132e4416e3635b62e@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Andrew Morton > wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:14:16 +0200 Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > > >> Add arch_ prefix to all atomic operations and include > >> . This will allow > >> to add KASAN instrumentation to all atomic ops. > > > > This gets a large number of (simple) rejects when applied to > > linux-next. Can you please redo against -next? > > > This is based on tip/locking tree. Ingo already took a part of these > series. The plan is that he takes the rest, and this applies on > tip/locking without conflicts. Yeah, so I've taken the rest as well, it all looks very clean now. Should show up in the next -next, if it passes my (arguably limited) testing. Andrew, is this workflow fine with you? You usually take KASAN patches, but I was unhappy with the atomics instrumention of the earlier patches, and ended up reviewing the followup variants, and felt that if I hinder a patchset I might as well test and apply it once I'm happy with them! ;-) Should be a special exception for this series only. Thanks, Ingo