From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754248AbdFWJGJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2017 05:06:09 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f196.google.com ([209.85.128.196]:35730 "EHLO mail-wr0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753931AbdFWJGG (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2017 05:06:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:06:01 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Last bits for initial 5-level paging enabling Message-ID: <20170623090601.njsmucxdy4rev6zw@gmail.com> References: <20170622122608.80435-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170622122608.80435-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > As Ingo requested I've split and updated last two patches for my previous > patchset. > > Please review and consider applying. > > Kirill A. Shutemov (5): > x86: Enable 5-level paging support > x86/mm: Rename tasksize_32bit/64bit to task_size_32bit/64bit > x86/mpx: Do not allow MPX if we have mappings above 47-bit > x86/mm: Prepare to expose larger address space to userspace > x86/mm: Allow userspace have mapping above 47-bit Ok, looks pretty neat now. Can I apply them in this order cleanly, without breaking bisection: > x86/mm: Rename tasksize_32bit/64bit to task_size_32bit/64bit > x86/mpx: Do not allow MPX if we have mappings above 47-bit > x86/mm: Prepare to expose larger address space to userspace > x86/mm: Allow userspace have mapping above 47-bit > x86: Enable 5-level paging support ? I.e. I'd like to move the first patch last. The reason is that we should first get all quirks and assumptions fixed, all facilities implemented - and only then enable 5-level paging as a final step which produces a well working kernel. (This should also make it slightly easier to analyze any potential regressions in earlier patches.) Thanks, Ingo