From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751993AbdF3CI7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:08:59 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59658 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751625AbdF3CI6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:08:58 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 96D4D22B65 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=acme@kernel.org Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 23:08:53 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Adrian Hunter Cc: Andi Kleen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 25/37] perf script: Add synthesized Intel PT power and ptwrite events Message-ID: <20170630020853.GC12064@kernel.org> References: <1495786658-18063-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <1495786658-18063-26-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <20170628130438.GB3342@kernel.org> <20170628185337.GC3342@kernel.org> <363DA0ED52042842948283D2FC38E4649BEC774E@IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com> <20170628202621.GA12064@kernel.org> <4c095bcf-8877-dad6-e291-48e5d025b09c@intel.com> <20170629201354.GB12064@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170629201354.GB12064@kernel.org> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 05:13:54PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:56:25PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu: > > On 06/28/2017 11:26 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Right, and I've not been able to focus on this, but I think the problem > > > is with packed mixed with unnamed unions :-\ > > Another possibility is to avoid packed altogether e.g. > This one builds on centos:6, now running the full set of containers, > will let you know the results. Ok, passes all tests (gcc, clang where available) on: # dm 1 alpine:3.4: Ok 2 alpine:3.5: Ok 3 alpine:3.6: Ok 4 alpine:edge: Ok 5 android-ndk:r12b-arm: Ok 6 archlinux:latest: Ok 7 centos:5: Ok 8 centos:6: Ok 9 centos:7: Ok 10 debian:7: Ok 11 debian:8: Ok 12 debian:9: Ok 13 debian:experimental: Ok 14 debian:experimental-x-arm64: Ok 15 debian:experimental-x-mips: Ok 16 debian:experimental-x-mips64: Ok 17 debian:experimental-x-mipsel: Ok 18 fedora:20: Ok 19 fedora:21: Ok 20 fedora:22: Ok 21 fedora:23: Ok 22 fedora:24: Ok 23 fedora:24-x-ARC-uClibc: Ok 24 fedora:25: Ok 25 fedora:rawhide: Ok 26 mageia:5: Ok 27 opensuse:13.2: Ok 28 opensuse:42.1: Ok 29 opensuse:tumbleweed: Ok 30 ubuntu:12.04.5: Ok 31 ubuntu:14.04.4: Ok 32 ubuntu:14.04.4-x-linaro-arm64: Ok 33 ubuntu:15.10: Ok 34 ubuntu:16.04: Ok 35 ubuntu:16.04-x-arm: Ok 36 ubuntu:16.04-x-arm64: Ok 37 ubuntu:16.04-x-powerpc: Ok 38 ubuntu:16.04-x-powerpc64: Ok 39 ubuntu:16.04-x-powerpc64el: Ok 40 ubuntu:16.04-x-s390: Ok 41 ubuntu:16.10: Ok 42 ubuntu:17.04: Ok # Can you provide new versions for the relevant patches? Thanks, - Arnaldo