From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752148AbdF3OyY (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:54:24 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55746 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751751AbdF3OyY (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:54:24 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 21A4E22BD9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=acme@kernel.org Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:54:18 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Adrian Hunter Cc: Andi Kleen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 25/37] perf script: Add synthesized Intel PT power and ptwrite events Message-ID: <20170630145418.GG12064@kernel.org> References: <1495786658-18063-26-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <20170628130438.GB3342@kernel.org> <20170628185337.GC3342@kernel.org> <363DA0ED52042842948283D2FC38E4649BEC774E@IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com> <20170628202621.GA12064@kernel.org> <4c095bcf-8877-dad6-e291-48e5d025b09c@intel.com> <20170629201354.GB12064@kernel.org> <20170630020853.GC12064@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:51:22AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu: > On 06/30/2017 05:08 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 05:13:54PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > Ok, passes all tests (gcc, clang where available) on: > > 41 ubuntu:16.10: Ok > > 42 ubuntu:17.04: Ok > > Can you provide new versions for the relevant patches? > I have sent new versions of the 2 patches affected. Thanks, a grafted those in my branch, will perform the usual build tests, then try it on a kaby lake machine. Have you thought about further "perf test" test cases to make sure this code stays working with all this infrastructure and details? Things like running synthetic workloads and getting a short sequence known to have these new packet types, checking if the hardware performing the tests is capable of generating such traces, etc? - Arnaldo