From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752094AbdF3R3x (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:29:53 -0400
Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:56666 "EHLO
        mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751918AbdF3R3v (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:29:51 -0400
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:29:43 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        mingo@redhat.com, dave@stgolabs.net, manfred@colorfullife.com,
        tj@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        peterz@infradead.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
        parri.andrea@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 12/26] arm64: Remove spin_unlock_wait() arch-specific
 definitions
Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
References: <20170629235918.GA6445@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <1498780894-8253-12-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20170630092057.GD9726@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170630092057.GD9726@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
x-cbid: 17063017-0052-0000-0000-00000233BD30
X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: 
X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00007298; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007;
 PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000214; SDB=6.00880954; UDB=6.00439220; IPR=6.00661107;
 BA=6.00005448; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000;
 ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00016024; XFM=3.00000015;
 UTC=2017-06-30 17:29:48
X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused
x-cbparentid: 17063017-0053-0000-0000-000051299985
Message-Id: <20170630172943.GY2393@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-06-30_12:,,
 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0
 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam
 adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000
 definitions=main-1706300274
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:20:57AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 05:01:20PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
> > and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
> > pair.  This commit therefore removes the underlying arch-specific
> > arch_spin_unlock_wait().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> > Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 58 ++++-----------------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> 
> I'm going to miss this code.

;-) ;-) ;-)

> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Applied, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul