From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752143AbdGDGpm (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2017 02:45:42 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:36205 "EHLO mail-pf0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750879AbdGDGpk (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2017 02:45:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 12:15:36 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Mark Brown Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" , Rafael Wysocki , Vincent Guittot , Rob Herring , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel , rnayak@codeaurora.org, Shiraz Hashim , linux-arm-kernel Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] drivers: Add boot constraints core Message-ID: <20170704064536.GG3532@vireshk-i7> References: <20170630035533.GV29665@vireshk-i7> <20170630041211.GX29665@vireshk-i7> <20170630051203.GY29665@vireshk-i7> <20170630084330.GB29665@vireshk-i7> <20170630121026.azppihjqls5i6bbr@sirena.org.uk> <20170703061552.GB3532@vireshk-i7> <20170703150733.sop6yrrpfl3ne32g@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170703150733.sop6yrrpfl3ne32g@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03-07-17, 16:07, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 11:45:52AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > The above regulator-min/max-microvolt values I mentioned were for the regulator > > device and not what the consumers would request. Yes, DMA will request something > > If you're putting the maximum possible range that the physical regulator > can supply into machine constraints then you really haven't understood > what machine constraints are at all. I wasn't referring to the limits of the physical regulators but the min/max that the consumers can set on a particular platform. > No, it really shouldn't. Please read what I wrote. Sorry about that. Understood it now. -- viresh