From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751284AbdGMJqP (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2017 05:46:15 -0400 Received: from sauhun.de ([88.99.104.3]:48122 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750877AbdGMJqO (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2017 05:46:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:46:10 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: move include files out of include/linux/i2c Message-ID: <20170713094610.noqty3z6sty6mfj5@ninjato> References: <20170521203743.6514-1-wsa@the-dreams.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="juelcupbh4j3m3xb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170521203743.6514-1-wsa@the-dreams.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --juelcupbh4j3m3xb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi peda, On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:37:41PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > It doesn't make sense to use include/linux/i2c for client drivers which m= ay in > fact rather be hwmon or input or whatever devices. As a result, I want to > deprecate include/linux/i2c for good. This series moves the include files= to a > better location, largely include/platform_data because that is what most = of the > moved include files contain. Note that some files don't seem to have upst= ream > users in board code, so they maybe could even be removed? I didn't check = for > that now, but I did it for one i2c master driver recently. So, it may be > possible. >=20 > And while i2c muxes might be a corner case, I still want to deprecate > include/linux/i2c for good ;) >=20 > No runtime testing because of no HW, but buildbot is happy with this seri= es at > least. A branch can be found here: >=20 > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/platform_= data Since there were no other i2c-mux patches this merge window and thus no pull request, do you mind if I pick these two patches for my second pull request this merge window to have them included in 4.13 already? Regards, Wolfram --juelcupbh4j3m3xb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAllnQV4ACgkQFA3kzBSg KbbFHw//fJnTITtucNYygzlfdKCczpPsH8w6W8gqCT3vnBIdvjTGQBBAenlSlmPh TaTp29p1ZImBCaE8HJzG2i1ivwUL6XFvNdv9DVrLtyZMh2fVS0OQ6z1y0DrJDUs/ etS3+H7PMSglSLUbjMIWmTIbPOUdV7YYx2P+6TKLv6+1ycdMzEczZl4zwr2ZDw4X o6YaIl1eS19SOghLS8wbPau1A8JUWPVZaJ+YxU3goeyyyAjlNrTOmurlu5cvVQtW XVAPewpeLboFOXMTJd1/4v89AWm4JugScJCRQWr2oOm5V/3Wy+rO5IwgHpaccyCs UcDiC6Zdwxfr8ZPvTr4HNgArZihfV5TD/8NJ/RKIskfAcN2QMElg6ttxwMJWUNif 7JC1Bi7g5HY42BrJQllQ9X7P70MW5JCTeQfq5zJBbhw6WckAXcf9JvzgM9K/zJ5N QoFR88y12fZeZYc/vUQ6DBT7LFDjRTNZsisajbWuT9yo3a+tEVjT3Q4iVaZLimzm jJxZtNjqJhm2h8DqGCIW+vT979vpqrpOr7j22hL5zPeVsatWaOaGDkHSZp+a1i5j ctSgjuNUsHqIvQwzi5GMYWx0m3xZJfll01kYnAv4MCop2hPSLm7q2qMuhk4pEUHN 0jXGplPMQs1KNbPwgeqzTtYy136FaFOoIMw6YO8Vyv2RJjqPC0U= =tOI8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --juelcupbh4j3m3xb--