linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Andrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>, Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] signal/testing: Don't look for __SI_FAULT in userspace
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:06:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170718140651.15973-5-ebiederm@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o9shg7t7.fsf_-_@xmission.com>

Fix the debug print statements in these tests where they reference
si_codes and in particular __SI_FAULT.  __SI_FAULT is a kernel
internal value and should never be seen by userspace.

While I am in there also fix si_code_str.  si_codes are an enumeration
there are not a bitmap so == and not & is the apropriate operation to
test for an si_code.

Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: 5f23f6d082a9 ("x86/pkeys: Add self-tests")
Fixes: e754aedc26ef ("x86/mpx, selftests: Add MPX self test")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c   |  3 +--
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 13 ++++++-------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
index a8df159a8924..ec0f6b45ce8b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
@@ -391,8 +391,7 @@ void handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
 		br_count++;
 		dprintf1("#BR 0x%jx (total seen: %d)\n", status, br_count);
 
-#define __SI_FAULT      (3 << 16)
-#define SEGV_BNDERR     (__SI_FAULT|3)  /* failed address bound checks */
+#define SEGV_BNDERR     3  /* failed address bound checks */
 
 		dprintf2("Saw a #BR! status 0x%jx at %016lx br_reason: %jx\n",
 				status, ip, br_reason);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
index 3237bc010e1c..23927845518d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -212,19 +212,18 @@ void dump_mem(void *dumpme, int len_bytes)
 	}
 }
 
-#define __SI_FAULT      (3 << 16)
-#define SEGV_BNDERR     (__SI_FAULT|3)  /* failed address bound checks */
-#define SEGV_PKUERR     (__SI_FAULT|4)
+#define SEGV_BNDERR     3  /* failed address bound checks */
+#define SEGV_PKUERR     4
 
 static char *si_code_str(int si_code)
 {
-	if (si_code & SEGV_MAPERR)
+	if (si_code == SEGV_MAPERR)
 		return "SEGV_MAPERR";
-	if (si_code & SEGV_ACCERR)
+	if (si_code == SEGV_ACCERR)
 		return "SEGV_ACCERR";
-	if (si_code & SEGV_BNDERR)
+	if (si_code == SEGV_BNDERR)
 		return "SEGV_BNDERR";
-	if (si_code & SEGV_PKUERR)
+	if (si_code == SEGV_PKUERR)
 		return "SEGV_PKUERR";
 	return "UNKNOWN";
 }
-- 
2.10.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-18 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <87lgot2loq.fsf@xmission.com>
     [not found] ` <87zid90vye.fsf_-_@xmission.com>
     [not found]   ` <20170615225426.GP31671@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
     [not found]     ` <87poe4zrs1.fsf@xmission.com>
     [not found]       ` <CA+55aFxpv+gchzs7AYgSC8feAOV=B6mjFgBVm4Kx+83J2CNE-w@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]         ` <87poe3vsa9.fsf@xmission.com>
     [not found]           ` <CALCETrX=SquyR8JZqHDNx=_FQKQo-0u9AxfdUwJs_hujVO2A-g@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]             ` <87h8zfua59.fsf@xmission.com>
     [not found]               ` <CALCETrWPBn31Dye=81r2ZMainNOnDy5c_QxbU2uRjnJs0ie=Zg@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                 ` <87r2yjsuwl.fsf@xmission.com>
     [not found]                   ` <20170616191602.GA10675@1wt.eu>
2017-06-30 12:36                     ` [PATCH 0/8] signal: Fix sending signals with siginfo Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-18 14:04                       ` [PATCH v2 0/7] " Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-18 14:06                         ` [PATCH 1/7] signal/alpha: Document a conflict with SI_USER for SIGTRAP Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-18 18:22                           ` Richard Henderson
2017-07-18 14:06                         ` [PATCH 2/7] signal/ia64: Document a conflict with SI_USER with SIGFPE Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-18 14:06                         ` [PATCH 3/7] signal/sparc: " Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-18 14:06                         ` [PATCH 4/7] signal/mips: " Eric W. Biederman
2017-08-07 16:18                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-08-07 17:41                             ` Linus Torvalds
2017-08-07 19:55                               ` Ralf Baechle
2017-08-08 15:29                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-08-08 23:19                               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-07-18 14:06                         ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2017-07-18 14:06                         ` [PATCH 6/7] fcntl: Don't use ambiguous SIG_POLL si_codes Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-20 16:16                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-07-21  2:33                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-18 14:06                         ` [PATCH 7/7] signal: Remove kernel interal si_code magic Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-18 16:57                           ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-18 17:27                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-22 20:25                               ` Simplfying copy_siginfo_to_user Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-24 17:43                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-24 19:01                                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-25  1:37                                   ` Al Viro
2017-07-31 16:37                                     ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170718140651.15973-5-ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=avagin@openvz.org \
    --cc=avagin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=xemul@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).