From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752203AbdGVGs4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jul 2017 02:48:56 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:31997 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750989AbdGVGsy (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jul 2017 02:48:54 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,394,1496127600"; d="scan'208";a="1154104817" Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 12:21:33 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Pierre-Yves MORDRET Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Russell King , Dan Williams , "M'boumba Cedric Madianga" , Fabrice GASNIER , Herbert Xu , Fabien DESSENNE , Amelie Delaunay , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] dmaengine: Add STM32 DMAMUX driver Message-ID: <20170722065133.GT3053@localhost> References: <1499343623-5964-1-git-send-email-pierre-yves.mordret@st.com> <1499343623-5964-3-git-send-email-pierre-yves.mordret@st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1499343623-5964-3-git-send-email-pierre-yves.mordret@st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 02:20:20PM +0200, Pierre-Yves MORDRET wrote: > +static int stm32_dmamux_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node; > + struct device_node *dma_node; > + struct stm32_dmamux_data *stm32_dmamux; > + struct resource *res; > + void __iomem *iomem; > + int i, ret; > + > + if (!node) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + stm32_dmamux = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*stm32_dmamux), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!stm32_dmamux) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + dma_node = of_parse_phandle(node, "dma-masters", 0); > + if (!dma_node) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't get DMA master node\n"); > + return -ENODEV; > + } > + > + if (device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "dma-channels", > + &stm32_dmamux->dmamux_channels)) > + stm32_dmamux->dmamux_channels = STM32_DMAMUX_MAX_CHANNELS; > + > + if (device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "dma-requests", > + &stm32_dmamux->dmamux_requests)) > + stm32_dmamux->dmamux_requests = STM32_DMAMUX_MAX_REQUESTS; I think defaults should be warned here too > + > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > + if (!res) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + iomem = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); > + if (!iomem) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + spin_lock_init(&stm32_dmamux->lock); > + > + stm32_dmamux->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); > + if (IS_ERR(stm32_dmamux->clk)) { > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Missing controller clock\n"); Can you check for EPROBE_DEFER and print only for if that is not the error otherwise we end up sapmming with defered probe issues > + > +#ifndef __DMA_STM32_DMAMUX_H > +#define __DMA_STM32_DMAMUX_H > + > +#if defined(CONFIG_STM32_DMAMUX) > +int stm32_dmamux_set_config(struct device *dev, void *route_data, u32 chan_id); Why do we need a custom API in this case? -- ~Vinod