From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752484AbdGXCqw (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jul 2017 22:46:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54806 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751858AbdGXCqn (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jul 2017 22:46:43 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 40415883BA Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ming.lei@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 40415883BA Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:46:27 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: "Huang, Ying" Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ross Zwisler , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Johannes Weiner , Minchan Kim , Hugh Dickins , Shaohua Li , Rik van Riel , Andrea Arcangeli , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Jens Axboe , Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -v2 00/12] mm, THP, swap: Delay splitting THP after swapped out Message-ID: <20170724024622.GB12871@ming.t460p> References: <20170623071303.13469-1-ying.huang@intel.com> <20170721162129.077f7d9b4c77c8593e47aed9@linux-foundation.org> <874lu2ircj.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874lu2ircj.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Mon, 24 Jul 2017 02:46:43 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 08:57:48AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > Andrew Morton writes: > > > On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:12:51 +0800 "Huang, Ying" wrote: > > > >> From: Huang Ying > >> > >> Hi, Andrew, could you help me to check whether the overall design is > >> reasonable? > >> > >> Hi, Johannes and Minchan, Thanks a lot for your review to the first > >> step of the THP swap optimization! Could you help me to review the > >> second step in this patchset? > >> > >> Hi, Hugh, Shaohua, Minchan and Rik, could you help me to review the > >> swap part of the patchset? Especially [01/12], [02/12], [03/12], > >> [04/12], [11/12], and [12/12]. > >> > >> Hi, Andrea and Kirill, could you help me to review the THP part of the > >> patchset? Especially [01/12], [03/12], [07/12], [08/12], [09/12], > >> [11/12]. > >> > >> Hi, Johannes, Michal, could you help me to review the cgroup part of > >> the patchset? Especially [08/12], [09/12], and [10/12]. > >> > >> And for all, Any comment is welcome! > > > > I guess it's time for a resend. Folks, could we please get some more > > review&test going here? > > Sure. Will resend it ASAP. And Thanks for reminding! > > >> Because the THP swap writing support patch [06/12] needs to be rebased > >> on multipage bvec patchset which hasn't been merged yet. The [06/12] > >> in this patchset is just a test patch and will be rewritten later. > >> The patchset depends on multipage bvec patchset too. > > > > Are these dependency issues any simpler now? > > Ming Lei has sent the v2 of multipage bvec patchset on June 26th. Jens > Axboe thinks the patchset will target v4.14. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/26/538 I will rebase the patchset against v4.13-rcX and send v3 out later. Thanks, Ming