From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751704AbdGaKzo (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 31 Jul 2017 06:55:44 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:36846 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750869AbdGaKzn (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 31 Jul 2017 06:55:43 -0400
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:55:40 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@suse.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
Subject: Re: FSGSBASE ABI considerations
Message-ID: <20170731105540.tovjhththy2u2dtb@node.shutemov.name>
References: <CALCETrVSm9tLiHKf-BKaYknEfko1bd_2i+4U7cqELG5iiFDygg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVSm9tLiHKf-BKaYknEfko1bd_2i+4U7cqELG5iiFDygg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 08:05:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Hi all-
> 
> Chang wants to get the FSGSBASE patches in.  Here's a bit on a brain
> dump on what I think the relevant considerations are and why I haven't
> sent out my patches.

I'm not sure if it would be relevant input for the descussion, but there's
another issue with FSGSBASE vs LA57:

http://lkml.kernel.org/r/9ddf602b-6c8b-8c1e-ab46-07ed12366593@redhat.com

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov