From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Switching to MQ by default may generate some bug reports
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 11:46:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170803104657.eyxuona33ar5cpp4@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DAC70C00-B51D-4752-8EA7-EA55368918EC@linaro.org>
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:44:06AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
> > That series is dealing with problems with legacy-deadline vs mq-none where
> > as the bulk of the problems reported in this mail are related to
> > legacy-CFQ vs mq-BFQ.
> >
>
> Out-of-curiosity: you get no regression with mq-none or mq-deadline?
>
I didn't test mq-none as the underlying storage was not fast enough to
make a legacy-noop vs mq-none meaningful. legacy-deadline vs mq-deadline
did show small regressions on some workloads but not as dramatic and
small enough that it would go unmissed in some cases.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-03 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-03 8:51 Switching to MQ by default may generate some bug reports Mel Gorman
2017-08-03 9:17 ` Ming Lei
2017-08-03 9:32 ` Ming Lei
2017-08-03 9:42 ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-03 9:44 ` Paolo Valente
2017-08-03 10:46 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2017-08-03 9:57 ` Ming Lei
2017-08-03 10:47 ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-03 11:48 ` Ming Lei
2017-08-03 9:21 ` Paolo Valente
2017-08-03 11:01 ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-04 7:26 ` Paolo Valente
2017-08-04 11:01 ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-04 22:05 ` Paolo Valente
2017-08-05 11:54 ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-07 17:35 ` Paolo Valente
2017-08-07 17:32 ` Paolo Valente
2017-08-07 18:42 ` Paolo Valente
2017-08-08 8:06 ` Paolo Valente
2017-08-08 17:33 ` Paolo Valente
2017-08-08 18:27 ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-09 21:49 ` Paolo Valente
2017-08-10 8:44 ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-08 10:30 ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-08 10:43 ` Ming Lei
2017-08-08 11:27 ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-08 11:49 ` Ming Lei
2017-08-08 11:55 ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-08 17:16 ` Paolo Valente
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170803104657.eyxuona33ar5cpp4@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).