From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752001AbdHDDmz (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 23:42:55 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:39444 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751887AbdHDDmx (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 23:42:53 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 05:42:06 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Toshi Kani Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, mchehab@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_oemlist() interface Message-ID: <20170804034206.GB12082@nazgul.tnic> References: <20170803215753.30553-1-toshi.kani@hpe.com> <20170803215753.30553-2-toshi.kani@hpe.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170803215753.30553-2-toshi.kani@hpe.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 03:57:47PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote: > ACPI OEM ID / OEM Table ID / Revision can be used to identify > a platform based on ACPI firmware info. acpi_blacklisted(), > intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists(), and some other funcs, > have been using similar check to detect a list of platforms > that require special handlings. > > Move the platform check in acpi_blacklisted() to a new common > utility function, acpi_match_oemlist(), so that other drivers > do not have to implement their own version. > > There is no change in functionality. > > Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" > Cc: Borislav Petkov > --- > drivers/acpi/blacklist.c | 83 ++++++++-------------------------------------- > drivers/acpi/utils.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/acpi.h | 19 +++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c b/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c > index bb542ac..bf44573 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c > @@ -30,30 +30,13 @@ > > #include "internal.h" > > -enum acpi_blacklist_predicates { > - all_versions, > - less_than_or_equal, > - equal, > - greater_than_or_equal, > -}; > - > -struct acpi_blacklist_item { > - char oem_id[7]; > - char oem_table_id[9]; > - u32 oem_revision; > - char *table; > - enum acpi_blacklist_predicates oem_revision_predicate; > - char *reason; > - u32 is_critical_error; > -}; > - > static struct dmi_system_id acpi_rev_dmi_table[] __initdata; > > /* > * POLICY: If *anything* doesn't work, put it on the blacklist. > * If they are critical errors, mark it critical, and abort driver load. > */ > -static struct acpi_blacklist_item acpi_blacklist[] __initdata = { > +static struct acpi_oemlist acpi_blacklist[] __initdata = { All that wasted energy to try to explain to you that "oemlist" is wrong and that whole rename is pointless, went for nothing. So NAK. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --