linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	cyphar@cyphar.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Jess Frazelle <acidburn@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: debug: use task_pid_nr_ns in /proc/$pid/sched
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 10:44:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170807084451.rdtsjws6hwtdy6ki@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170806044141.5093-1-asarai@suse.com>

On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 02:41:41PM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> It appears as though the addition of the PID namespace did not update
> the output code for /proc/*/sched, which resulted in it providing PIDs
> that were not self-consistent with the /proc mount. This additionally
> made it trivial to detect whether a process was inside &init_pid_ns from
> userspace (making container detection trivial[1]). This lead to
> situations such as:
> 
>   % unshare -pmf
>   % mount -t proc proc /proc
>   % head -n1 /proc/1/sched
>   head (10047, #threads: 1)
> 
> Fix this by just using task_pid_nr_ns for the output of /proc/*/sched.
> All of the other uses of task_pid_nr in kernel/sched/debug.c are from a
> sysctl context and thus don't need to be namespaced.
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/jessfraz/amicontained
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Jess Frazelle <acidburn@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.com>

Thanks!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-07  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-06  4:41 [PATCH v2] sched: debug: use task_pid_nr_ns in /proc/$pid/sched Aleksa Sarai
2017-08-06 14:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-08-07  8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-08-07 15:18   ` Jessie Frazelle
2017-08-08 15:17     ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-08-10 12:09 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/debug: Use " tip-bot for Aleksa Sarai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170807084451.rdtsjws6hwtdy6ki@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acidburn@google.com \
    --cc=asarai@suse.com \
    --cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).