linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David R <david@unsolicited.net>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
	NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [MD] Crash with 4.12+ kernel and high disk load -- bisected to 4ad23a976413: MD: use per-cpu counter for writes_pending
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 06:55:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170808065526.Horde.9rrpLi3TCaOrBk9KfEU4ZFP@vinovium.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170808045103.xpi32xkjidjuxczq@kernel.org>


Quoting Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>:

> Spent some time to check this one, unfortunately I can't find how that patch
> makes rcu stall. the percpu part looks good to me too. Can you  
> double check if
> reverting 4ad23a976413aa57 makes the issue go away? When the rcu  
> stall happens,
> what the /sys/block/md/md0/array_state? please also attach /proc/mdstat. When
> you say the mdx_raid1 threads are in 'R' state, can you double check if the
> /proc/pid/stack always 0xffffffffff?
>
> Thanks,
> Shaohua

I confess to knowing absolutely nothing about the md code, so please  
don't be too hard on me. However
:-

static bool set_in_sync(struct mddev *mddev)
{
     WARN_ON_ONCE(!spin_is_locked(&mddev->lock));
     if (!mddev->in_sync) {
         mddev->sync_checkers++;
         spin_unlock(&mddev->lock);
         percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_sync(&mddev->writes_pending);
         spin_lock(&mddev->lock);
         if (!mddev->in_sync &&
             percpu_ref_is_zero(&mddev->writes_pending)) {
             mddev->in_sync = 1;
             /*
              * Ensure ->in_sync is visible before we clear
              * ->sync_checkers.
              */
             smp_mb();
             set_bit(MD_SB_CHANGE_CLEAN, &mddev->sb_flags);
             sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(mddev->sysfs_state);
         }
         if (--mddev->sync_checkers == 0)
             percpu_ref_switch_to_percpu(&mddev->writes_pending);


The switch_to_percpu() takes place under mddev->lock however  
switch_to_atomic_sync() does not. A thread can be in the middle of (or  
about to execute) switch_to_atomic_sync() at the same time as another  
is calling switch_to_percpu(). This can't be correct surely?

Cheers
David

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-08  6:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <ee7921d2-d3ff-2381-1f05-2c07b8001d08@unsolicited.net>
2017-08-06 17:37 ` RESEND: Crash with 4.12.4 kernel and high disk load (monthly RAID 6 check) David R
2017-08-07 11:20   ` [MD] Crash with 4.12+ kernel and high disk load -- bisected to 4ad23a976413: MD: use per-cpu counter for writes_pending Dominik Brodowski
2017-08-08  4:51     ` Shaohua Li
2017-08-08  6:55       ` David R [this message]
2017-08-08  7:01         ` David R
2017-08-08  7:04         ` NeilBrown
2017-08-08  7:10       ` Dominik Brodowski
2017-08-08  7:01     ` NeilBrown
2017-08-08  7:36       ` Dominik Brodowski
2017-08-08  9:06         ` Dominik Brodowski
2017-08-09  6:28           ` David R
2017-08-08  8:02       ` David R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170808065526.Horde.9rrpLi3TCaOrBk9KfEU4ZFP@vinovium.com \
    --to=david@unsolicited.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).