From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752414AbdHRFXC (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 18 Aug 2017 01:23:02 -0400
Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:14119 "EHLO mga03.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751851AbdHRFXA (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 18 Aug 2017 01:23:00 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,391,1498546800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="1184146744"
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:56:13 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Anup Patel <anup.patel@broadcom.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM Kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Device Tree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support
Message-ID: <20170818052613.GE3053@localhost>
References: <1501583880-32072-1-git-send-email-anup.patel@broadcom.com>
 <1501583880-32072-16-git-send-email-anup.patel@broadcom.com>
 <20170817080142.GC3053@localhost>
 <CAALAos_SXTMms8XmhEC28gxx4qvvr0z3wqQ=o_-BohMpcXwQTw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAALAos_SXTMms8XmhEC28gxx4qvvr0z3wqQ=o_-BohMpcXwQTw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:33:54AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:07:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > why fail, debugfs should be an optional thingy, why would you want to fail here?
> 
> Yes, we are handling the case when debugfs is not available
> and skipping debugfs gracefully.
> 
> If debugfs is available then failure of debugfs_create_dir()
> should be reported.

reported yes, bailing out on that err no..

-- 
~Vinod