linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	<kernel-team@fb.com>, <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [v6 0/4] cgroup-aware OOM killer
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 17:51:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170823165201.24086-2-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170823165201.24086-1-guro@fb.com>

This patchset makes the OOM killer cgroup-aware.

v6:
  - Renamed oom_control.chosen to oom_control.chosen_task
  - Renamed oom_kill_all_tasks to oom_kill_all
  - Per-node NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE accounting
  - Several minor fixes and cleanups
  - Docs updated

v5:
  - Rebased on top of Michal Hocko's patches, which have changed the
    way how OOM victims becoming an access to the memory
    reserves. Dropped corresponding part of this patchset
  - Separated the oom_kill_process() splitting into a standalone commit
  - Added debug output (suggested by David Rientjes)
  - Some minor fixes

v4:
  - Reworked per-cgroup oom_score_adj into oom_priority
    (based on ideas by David Rientjes)
  - Tasks with oom_score_adj -1000 are never selected if
    oom_kill_all_tasks is not set
  - Memcg victim selection code is reworked, and
    synchronization is based on finding tasks with OOM victim marker,
    rather then on global counter
  - Debug output is dropped
  - Refactored TIF_MEMDIE usage

v3:
  - Merged commits 1-4 into 6
  - Separated oom_score_adj logic and debug output into separate commits
  - Fixed swap accounting

v2:
  - Reworked victim selection based on feedback
    from Michal Hocko, Vladimir Davydov and Johannes Weiner
  - "Kill all tasks" is now an opt-in option, by default
    only one process will be killed
  - Added per-cgroup oom_score_adj
  - Refined oom score calculations, suggested by Vladimir Davydov
  - Converted to a patchset

v1:
  https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/18/969


Roman Gushchin (4):
  mm, oom: refactor the oom_kill_process() function
  mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer
  mm, oom: introduce oom_priority for memory cgroups
  mm, oom, docs: describe the cgroup-aware OOM killer

 Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt |  62 ++++++++++
 include/linux/memcontrol.h  |  36 ++++++
 include/linux/oom.h         |  12 +-
 mm/memcontrol.c             | 290 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/oom_kill.c               | 209 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 5 files changed, 539 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)

-- 
2.13.5

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-23 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-23 16:51 [v6 1/4] mm, oom: refactor the oom_kill_process() function Roman Gushchin
2017-08-23 16:51 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2017-08-23 16:51 ` [v6 2/4] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer Roman Gushchin
2017-08-23 23:19   ` David Rientjes
2017-08-25 10:57     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-08-24 11:47   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-24 12:28     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-08-24 12:58       ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-24 13:58         ` Roman Gushchin
2017-08-24 14:13           ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-24 14:58             ` Roman Gushchin
2017-08-25  8:14               ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-25 10:39                 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-08-25 10:58                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-30 11:22                 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-08-30 20:56                   ` David Rientjes
2017-08-31 13:34                     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-08-31 20:01                       ` David Rientjes
2017-08-23 16:52 ` [v6 3/4] mm, oom: introduce oom_priority for memory cgroups Roman Gushchin
2017-08-24 12:10   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-24 12:51     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-08-24 13:48       ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-24 14:11         ` Roman Gushchin
2017-08-28 20:54           ` David Rientjes
2017-08-23 16:52 ` [v6 4/4] mm, oom, docs: describe the cgroup-aware OOM killer Roman Gushchin
2017-08-24 11:15 ` [v6 1/4] mm, oom: refactor the oom_kill_process() function Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170823165201.24086-2-guro@fb.com \
    --to=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).